In the event of resistance to an arrest, what is a law enforcement officer justified in using?

In situations involving resistance to an arrest, law enforcement officers are justified in using any necessary force to ensure that they can safely and effectively carry out their duties. This principle is based on the legal concept of "use of force" which allows officers to take appropriate measures to control a situation when faced with physical resistance. The force must be reasonable and proportional to the level of resistance encountered.

When officers are faced with resistance, they must assess the situation and respond accordingly, which may include a range of options from verbal commands to physical control techniques, and, in extreme cases, the use of lethal force if their lives or the lives of others are in immediate danger. The objective is to maintain the authority of the law and ensure the safety of both the officer and the public.

The other choices reflect an overly restricted approach. Limiting an officer to only using verbal commands might be impractical in a situation where physical resistance is encountered and can place both the officer and the public in danger. Stipulating "only non-lethal force" overlooks scenarios where greater levels of force might be necessary for the safety of all parties involved. Lastly, the idea that no force should be used at all to prevent escalation may lead to situations where law enforcement is unable to control a